Thus, whenever will be themselves to speak in learning have necessity to need regarding the agreement in relation it and the focus that if she intends to give. One very says in pertaining to school pedagogia, failure, inclusion, exclusion and seems that it is little mentioned to learn and the learning processes. Of – much lesson, extends horria load, remains more time the learning ' ' ocupados' ' , but this nor always means greater learning. What it would be really to learn? A first idea met in Antunes (2002) on learning. It means to reorganize the thought system with which we understand the things, people and, of course, the world. For Morgan (1977), learning is any relatively permanent change in the behavior, and that it results of practical experience or. In accordance with Senge (2003), is not only people who learn, the organizations also learns, however … difficulty in speaking in ' ' organizations aprendentes' ' nowadays it is that the term ' ' aprendizagem' ' it lost its meaning central in the use that today becomes of it.
Most of the people turns the eyes impatiently when it hears to speak in ' ' organizations aprendentes' ' ' ' aprendizagem' '. This is not to admire, because in the language of day-by-day learning if it became synonymous of ' ' to absorb informao' '. … Through the learning, us we recriamos in them to we ourselves. … we become in them capable to make something who never we had been capable to make before. …
we perceive the world and our relation stops with it. … we extend our capacity to create, of being gerativo party to suit of the life. (SENGE, 2003, P. 13-14). In the optics of Grossi (2004, P. 33), to learn it is not to obtain to remember teachings transmitted ready in lesson, but to make use of thought projects that allow to face problems.
For return of the first century after the birth of Christ, it appeared to the few what today it is known as the biggest daily pay-Hispanic city of the Mesoamrica, situated to the north of the City of Mexico, with a territorial area approximately of twenty and two kilometers squared, Teotihuacan already presented the characteristics of a city properly said. The population was grouped in quarters in accordance with origin, kinship or occupation, in turn the quarters were constituted of common houses and from well decorated palaces, the houses sheltered the common people and the palaces were inhabited by powerful priests. The significant urban organization of this population can be perceived when observed that already at that time the avenues and streets of the city were paved and them they enjoyed of a well planned system of draining, without counting that it was a society where already the division of the work existed, a competent army, an organized commerce and an agriculture that was not come back only toward the subsistence. It was the first city planned of Americas, its admirable buildings had been constructed throughout ' ' sidewalk of mortos' ' or also of ' ' avenue of mortos' ' , that thus the great presence of enterramentos is called by the archaeologists due to its edges, possessing about two kilometers of extension. They are distinguished as the main constructions of the city: the Pyramid of the Sun, constructed in century I d.C with sixty meters of height; the Pyramid of the Moon with date of construction between 100 and 200 d.C with forty and two mere of height and finally the Palace of 200 dated Quetzalcatl of d.C. Between 400 years 200 and d.C. Teotihuacan starts to have a very great population, with something in cinquenta lathe a thousand inhabitants. Had this great urban accumulation, the necessity appears of more constructions, over all in the residential scope, is constructed (now in well bigger number) the multifamiliar sets, that have as objective main to accomodate this immense population.