Or, to be more farandulera if it wants to, nor nowhere you think mentioning Venezuela figure even in the Record Guinness from 2008 as the happiest demonym of the Earth (go and investigate it yourself, man, and leave conflict with fonts). So the opposition Venezuelan political establishment seems to suggest, when it insists on not believing in verdicts of institutions once beloved, which should be two UN, two UNDP and up to two organizations of records (Guinness Word Records) to quench your virtual world anxiety. (Oh, that second option of reality that is always giving!) These points could justify, naturally, high levels of acceptance of the presidential figure and its governance (for not detailing more and not make this note in a loa without self-criticism, given that it could run the risk of not limiting what follows). But there is the other problem that I apuntale above, that that the left-wing side seems to not wanting to see (at least in the high levels of leadership, of instances where speeches are afoot): insecurity and corruption. There is no doubt, and pod requests arrangements and care with the same strength and optimism with which we celebrate that the Bolivarian revolution has brought to the Venezuelan people a better quality of life index. It is a cloud, a crest of Tempest, which must be veneered with the impetus that Bolivar was offered up to confront nature. This not to mention now the new problem: power outages at national level. Around the clock are arguments that desdicen the good achieved, if we want to put serious and if we invoke the stoical, severe or masochistic (playful, ungrateful or whatever) human nature that seems to shift more with highlight defects than the achievements. Such arguments that you and I both know constitute a special front of attack by opposition sectors, whose counter-revolutionary discourse increasingly seems to be permeating both in urban centres and in rural areas, if we judge by the expressions of discomfort of a man standing, at the expense, incidentally, of the manipulations of the opinion of the media of the country. Live practically in the street brings me almost altaneramente to cry out I said!, and to leave my contribution analysis for those with operational capabilities within the political leadership.
Hopefully come a day when there are no more congresses of victims of terrorism because this is something as remote and as exotic as the biological species of Pleistocene. But I am afraid that it will not be so. In recent decades, terrorism has been endemic in the wide world: from Spain to Colombia, from Russia to Afghanistan. It has become, in addition, a random and unpredictable phenomenon to which nobody is alien and of which no one can escape, by many security measures to be adopted. Finally, the technology put at the service of terror has done more massive and more deadly: where a century ago there were only isolated assassinations, today cause hundreds of innocent and anonymous, dead victims simply because they were there.
The other aspect of the current terror is his character of show that reaches our homes through the TV, so banalizando the human suffering to do something comparable to any fiction dramatized by means of communication of masses. For all these reasons, we should not forget the terrorism nor trivialize it. Therefore, we must remember the victims and their pain as if it were our own, since all of us have been attacked in those killed or maimed in the name of all. We must not lose, thus the sensitivity to terrorism nor compassion solidarity with its victims. It should not make it any good citizen and even less those whom we elected to represent us: I am referring to the President of the Government, Mr Rodriguez Zapatero. Congress being held these days in Salamanca is not one minor or frivolous event, isn’t a fair agricultural machinery or a championship of marching bands that allow the delegate institutional presence in any person.
The fight against terrorism, its repudiation and the homage to its victims is something inherent to the democratic system. Democracy is precisely the absence of violence in ideological and political confrontation. Therefore, the defection today of the President of the Government is something absolutely unjustifiable.
The wars seem to not threaten the 21st century from the traditional viewpoint. Now come from inter-ethnic conflicts (Africa has been a pathetic example), of racism, of xenophobia, of terrorism, of extreme nationalism reborn as bonfires of religious intolerance as manifested in other mass killings. Specific areas of the planet case Europe – must face the aging of its population while it increases xenophobia towards migrant sectors must be that good part of their welfare state. We have already said that the peasant Word encompasses every day to fewer people, which indicates an urban concentration increasing, while migrations are similar in volume and characteristics. Thereto, in many cities are formed almost subjected to even apartheid slums and that, when in time, they burst, causing widespread damage. Problems, intermingle as do migration and urbanization. As others do with environmental degradation manifested in the seas, in the air and in the Earth.
It seems to lean the ethics as a priority task. Globalization advances as a phenomenon that justifies itself, an unstoppable advance, while policy stagnates, or better is immersed, to make way for authoritarian tendencies, to a possible widespread outbreak of totalitarianism. We have advocated for an encounter of cultures, a respect for plurality and diversity. Only with technology you can not, although we use it for the sake of knowledge and as a unique opportunity to learn to respect us by knowing that we acquire another. III are scarce the inventors of world. Protagonists of the theoretical vision of the policy are required. Here truths have been demolished and we must go on new forms of social organization. Who presides over the world is unbelief.
The old speeches are delegitimized. Someone has spoken of an ahistorical sky. If there is no philosophically approach emancipatory in the sense of giving the dream of a corpus of ideas nor will there be emancipation bass problems affecting us.